Order and conscience. You can see what the other protects, yet the one who builds and the one who guards cannot stand on the same rule.
ISTJ × INFJ is the Super-ego relation, one of the sixteen. It continues calmly because you do not come close.
Written as INFJ × ISTJ it is the same pair. In 16Personalities terms, the Logistician and the Advocate.
ISTJ builds order and pushes through if needed. INFJ guards the ethics of people and opens possibilities. To ISTJ, INFJ is someone doing with ease what ISTJ strains to do: seeing people. To INFJ, ISTJ is someone doing with ease what INFJ strains to do: building systems.
ISTJ's "logic that builds order" and INFJ's "ethics of people" each land in the other's third. The third is the place you perform in public because you think you should. What you perform, the other has without performing. Up close, your own performance begins to look thin. At a distance, it looks admirable.
In Augustinavičiūtė's observation, cross-exchange rarely occurs in this relation. Lives are entirely different, so you can contribute to each other in the form of advice and support out of the difference in experience. A partner without conflict, often comfortable, superficial yet reliable.
Acknowledging from afar, pushing each other up close.
Up close, ISTJ's pushing force touches INFJ's sore spot, and INFJ's talk of possibilities touches ISTJ's. ISTJ's pushing looks like violence to INFJ; INFJ's schemes look like groundless dreams to ISTJ.
What hurts is the second position. ISTJ's "force that pushes through" hits INFJ's fourth, the place they least want touched; INFJ's "eye that opens possibilities" hits ISTJ's fourth. The more the other moves in their practised way, the more it touches your sore spot. This is where respect turns to irritation up close. Given distance, the other's strength remains a stimulus.
The observation says: seeing the other as a distant ideal, while up close each only states their own view.
With separate specialities, you can contribute in the form of advice and support.
They see through people with ease.
Groundless dreams.
Pushed, they fall apart.
They build systems with ease.
They push.
They close possibilities.
You can hear what the other says, yet listening does not get you to the essence. It feels as if there were an invisible wall, the record says. The absence of disappointment is the difference from extinguishment; with no shared interests from the start, it ends by confirming that contact of deep interest is impossible.
Cool from outside, sympathetic within. You see the other as a distant, slightly mysterious ideal. It resonates more with distance and fades when the two of you are alone in a closed place, the record says.
It runs with one as the watch repairer and the other at the counter, and collapses when both do the same repair. With separate specialities, good cooperation; for marriage "not suited at all", and the couple becomes neurotic, the record says.
Martin Luther (LSI) × Erasmus (EII)
Typing: both types agree across several published sources
At first they acknowledged each other, and Erasmus valued Luther's reform from a distance. Asked to come closer, he kept his distance, and they parted decisively in the dispute over free will. Luther pushed; Erasmus refused to be pushed.
What matches: acknowledging each other from afar, and splitting when closeness touches the sore spot.
PROne thing for this relation
A relation that stays calm because you do not get close, so things that can be handed over from afar.
This pair is the superego relation, one of the sixteen. How the relation itself arises, and how to tell it from the others, is on the relation page.
ISTJ on the left, INFJ on the right. Each shows where the eight elements sit; lines connect the same element. Where each line starts and ends decides what happens in this relation.
Lines connect the same element in the other person's structure. 1–2 (strong) 3 (role) 4 (vulnerable) 5–6 (wanted) 7–8 (capable, indifferent)
This page is also available in Japanese: ISTJ と INFJ の相性. Русская версия: ISTJ × INFJ.
Pick any two of the 16 types. If you do not know the other person's type, eight questions about their behaviour will get you close.
Pick two types