16 Relations Pick two16 relations16 typesvs. other testsTheoryRead firstRU日本語

5 / 16

Semi-duality

準双対 · Полудуальные

Deep down it connects; up close it slips a little.

準双対 / one of the sixteen relations

It fits by half. Where it matters you connect deeply, yet in the details of daily life you slip. "So close" is the phrase that fits this relation best.

SEMI-DUALITY

01  When you first meet

Connecting deep down

What you hold dear is close. What counts as good, what cannot be forgiven, line up. So you can have the heavy conversations. Things hard to explain to others get through to this person.

And one of you is actually supporting the other's weak spot. The support has the same shape as duality, but on one side only. So the early impression is very good.

Thinking "this is the one" in this relation is natural. In fact, for half of it, you are right.

02  After a while

The small things do not fit

The tempo of life, the speed of talking, the way things get done. The big values agree, yet the details of every day slip. And that slip repeats daily.

The other person is not at fault. They are responding, only in a shape different from the one you want. The feeling arrives, but the method does not fit. So you are grateful, and a little short.

And this shortfall is hard to put into words. Deep down you understand each other, so complaining makes you feel spoilt.

03  If it is to last

Where it matters, it stays in tune

The relation lasts long. The foundation fits, so there is no reason for a decisive break. The bigger the event, the more of a support it is; in daily life it wears down slowly. Strong in emergencies, laborious in ordinary times.

So it is better not to try to force the unfitting areas into line by effort. Dividing the chores, the routine of daily life, how often to be in touch. Solving these with a system is faster, and the relation is not damaged.

Do not let the slips in detail make you think lightly of the fit at the foundation. That match is the part nothing else can replace.

Telling it from duality

Both are relations of mutual support. The range of the support differs.

Does the effort shrink, or only by half
In duality, the effort of life as a whole keeps shrinking. In semi-duality it shrinks in one area and grows in another. On balance easier, but not complete.
Can you voice a complaint
In duality, complaints hardly arise in the first place. In semi-duality there are complaints, but too small to say. This difficulty of saying is the distinctive feature.
Emergencies or ordinary times: where does it work
Duality works from ordinary times on. Semi-duality shows its strength exactly at the big moments and wears down in the everyday.

Where this relation is useful

As long as you do not try to fill everything with just the two of you, it works very well.

Put small discomforts into words early
Too small to say, piling up unsaid: that is the typical way this relation gets stuck. Early on, it can be handed over as a light remark.
Leave the details of daily life to a system
The areas that do not fit will not fit by effort. Solving them with rules and tools reduces the wear on both sides.
Lean on it for the big decisions
Career, changing jobs, family matters. Here it is more of a support than any other relation. Using it where it is strong is the right answer.

PROne thing for this relation

A relation that connects deep down and slips up close, so tools to put the slip into words.

Works that draw this relation

Chosen from works where the relationship between the two is itself the centre of the story.

This is not a typing of the characters. They are listed as examples where the shape of this relation is drawn clearly.

Songs this relation runs through

Chosen from songs whose subject is exactly what happens between the two.

No lyrics are quoted. The songs are listed for the shape of relation they deal with.

Semi-duality in Model A: what talks to what

Example: INTJ and ENFJ. Every pair in this relation connects the same positions in the same way; only the elements inside change.

INTJ · LIIENFJ · EIEEGO1 leadingTiintroverted logic2 creativeNeextraverted intuitionSUPER-EGO4 vulnerableSeextraverted sensing3 roleFiintroverted ethicsSUPER-ID6 mobilizingSiintroverted sensing5 suggestiveFeextraverted ethicsID8 demonstrativeNiintroverted intuition7 ignoringTeextraverted logic1 leadingFeextraverted ethics2 creativeNiintroverted intuition4 vulnerableSiintroverted sensing3 roleTeextraverted logic6 mobilizingSeextraverted sensing5 suggestiveTiintroverted logic8 demonstrativeNeextraverted intuition7 ignoringFiintroverted ethics

Lines connect the same element in the other person's structure. 1–2 (strong) 3 (role) 4 (vulnerable) 5–6 (wanted) 7–8 (capable, indifferent)

1 → 5TiINTJ's 1 (leading) Ti (introverted logic) sits in ENFJ's position 5 (suggestive). What INTJ produces naturally is what ENFJ has been waiting for. The most comfortable flow.
2 → 8NeINTJ's 2 (creative) Ne (extraverted intuition) sits in ENFJ's position 8 (demonstrative). ENFJ can do what INTJ is good at but does not value it. INTJ feels slightly unappreciated.
3 → 7FiINTJ's 3 (role) Fi (introverted ethics) sits in ENFJ's position 7 (ignoring). ENFJ quietly covers INTJ's weak point. For ENFJ it is nothing.
4 → 6SeINTJ's 4 (vulnerable) Se (extraverted sensing) sits in ENFJ's position 6 (mobilizing). INTJ is weak here and ENFJ wants it. A gap neither can fill.
7 → 3TeINTJ's 7 (ignoring) Te (extraverted logic) sits in ENFJ's position 3 (role). INTJ could protect ENFJ's weak point but is not inclined to. Will if asked.
8 → 2NiINTJ's 8 (demonstrative) Ni (introverted intuition) sits in ENFJ's position 2 (creative). ENFJ's main field is one INTJ does not care about. Little friction, little interest.

The 8 pairs in this relation

Semi-duality is symmetric: it looks the same from either side.

The sixteen relations

4040jk version